top of page

193) TOP 10  Fake Holy Sites


193) TOP 10 -  Fake Holy sites (that is non bible).

These religious sites are partly erected by the Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, and Muslims etc, as permanent territorial markers in their conquests of cities, and entire nations. They are not biblical. Jesus preached peace and love. All 3 of these religions are in reality rooted in Empire building strategies, where Cathedrals, churches and Mosques are used a permanent excuse to invade countries again, or are used as reasons to expand their religion by colonisation.

1) Hagia Sophia - Cathedral built in the 6th century AD (532–537) under the direction of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I. This begs the question - if Orthodoxy is so "holy" and "right with God", why has it been a mosque for so long? And still is to this very day? Just as the Jewish religion is proven wrong by the fact that their temple in Jerusalem has been destroyed for almost 2,000 years. This is just one downside of having unbiblical religious so called "holy religious sites".

2) The Vatican & Saint Peter's Square : The Obelisk in St Peter's Square was erected by Emperor Nero, and was in the Circus Neronis, which was at his time lit by setting Christians on fire, and where Christians were fed to lions. Let me repeat this so you definitely understand, the Vatican and square are built on the site of the evil Roman Circus where people were martyred, people fed to lions, animals themselves tortured in combat against other animal, etc. It will be argued by the Orthodox this is no kind of site of theirs, despite their unity with Roman Catholics before the 1054 Split. However huge numbers of them are now ecumenical. The link between Nero, the man many in the historic school of prophecy believe was the antichrist is pretty frightening.


To justify that the Vatican is built on a place for mass murdering Christians, the Catholics and Popes use the ploy of saying Saint Peter was crucified there (upside down) and "thus" it is where the Vatican church "was founded" as Peter died there. There is in fact zero evidence Peter was ever even in Rome. Peter was "The Apostle to the Jews" it was Paul who was "The Apostle to the Gentiles".  

Galatians 2:8 .

"(For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)"

There is definite bible evidence Peter died by crucifixion, but not upside down, and not in Rome. The continual ploy of the Roman Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox is to fabricate a giant spider's web of fake history, s you do not know where real history begins and ends in an avalanche of traditional stories, a made up world of religion, just as they have in effect made up new laws by their traditions that contradict the revealed new testament Word of God. 

bottom of page